14 Jun 2017
Fr Martin writes…
“The words of Christ given as heading to today’s Gospel call for reflection at two levels: the message of Christ’s presence in the Eucharist in our own lives and in the society in which we live, and the problems encountered by the young people and others today regarding belief in Christ’s presence in the Eucharist under the symbols, or the species, of bread and wine. Many find it hard to believe this, and fail to understand it. We can reflect on both points for a while.
The Eucharist has been at the source and centre of Christianity down through the ages, and still remains so. Reflection on it brings to mind many demands of Christian living, as many as belief in the living Christ himself does. Instituted at the Last Supper, the last of his meals with followers, it recalls the many meals during his life and the significance of these, eating with the marginalized and the outcast.
In Mark’s Gospel, after the multiplications of the loaves, in a journey across the Sea of Galilee the evangelist notes that the apostles had forgotten to bring bread with them, having only one loaf. Jesus warns of the danger of certain leaven (yeast). The apostles think that he is referring to their lack of bread. Jesus reminds them of his multiplication of the loaves, and of their lack of understanding of the significance of the miracle (Mark 8:14-21). It is a curious text, but the point seems to be that Jesus is calling on his apostles (and the church) to reflect on the miracle of the loaves, his meals; eventually, the bread and wine become Eucharist, and we reflect on their significance as a sign and pledge of his saving and encouraging presence with the church, in times of need and always. There are so many aspects of the Eucharistic mystery that call for reflection.
The real presence of Christ under the species of bread and wine is a mystery, to be understood by faith. Already in Christ’s day, as represented in John’s Gospel, his Jewish listeners objected: ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’ Jesus replies, insisting on his teaching. Many of his disciples said, ‘This is a hard teaching; who can listen to it?’, and Jesus replied, ‘What if you were to see the Sin of Man ascending where he was before?’ (John 6:52-65).
We grasp the mystery of his Eucharistic presence better when we consider it in the context of Jesus, true man and true God, his ascent into heaven, and enthronement at God’s right hand. Down through the centuries, the Church has taken Jesus’ words on the bread and wine as his body and blood literally and lived with the mystery, a mystery as ever hard to put in human words. She has refused the view that the bread and wine only represent the body and blood of Christ. At the consecration, there is a transformation, in some way, of the elements involved – the bread and the wine. Her belief was incarnated in the respect for the bread and wine after the consecration, in the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament and in Eucharistic devotion. These were the manners in which the faithful expressed, and continue to express, their faith in Christ’s Eucharistic presence.
When the belief was challenged by Berengarius, the Church formally responded in 1079 that at the consecration the bread and wine were substantially changed into the body and blood of Christ. In the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), this change was referred to as transubstantiation. The Council of Trent (1551) took up the question once again at the Reformation, affirming that this change at the consecration the ‘holy Catholic Church properly and appropriately calls transubstantiation’, words repeated in the more recent (1994) Catechism of the Catholic Church (Paragraph 1376). Such Christian and Catholic beliefs as ‘consubstantial’ and ‘transubstantiation’, not being words current in ordinary discourse, should not be the subjects of popular opinion polls. They are terms chosen by the Church to make clear her position on certain mysteries.”
For more articles written by Fr Martin, please visit the Sunday Scripture Online.